The terms and conditions of the Standard Flood Insurance Policy (“SFIP”) are specified by regulations promulgated under the National Flood Insurance Act (“NFIA”). One of the terms in the SFIP provides that the insured cannot sue the flood carrier unless the insured has complied with all requirements of the policy and the insured must “start … Continue Reading
As we have written about before on this blog, the water damage caused by Hurricane Sandy in October 2012 gave rise to important questions concerning the applicability of so-called “anti-concurrent causation” clauses. Such was the case in the recently-decided matter of Carevel, LLC v. Aspen American Ins. Co., 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 157919 (D.N.J. Nov. … Continue Reading
In Johnson v. Omega Ins. Co., 2016 Fla. LEXIS 2148 (Sept. 29, 2016), the Florida Supreme Court determined that the 5th DCA misapplied and misinterpreted two statutes, the first providing a presumption of correctness to the initial report of an engineer retained by an insurer to investigate a sinkhole claim, and the second providing for … Continue Reading
As Superstorm Sandy insurance claims wend their way through the courts, we are beginning to see decisions related to motions on the pleadings, especially with regard to extracontractual claims. The first such decision in the New Jersey federal courts that we are aware of was recently issued in Beekman v. Excelsior Insurance Company and Peerless … Continue Reading
The Connecticut Supreme Court’s recent decision reaffirming that a CUTPA claim against an insurance company (or agent or broker) must be strictly limited to alleging improper practices that are in violation of CUIPA will be particularly helpful to insurers in defending lawsuits asserting unfair trade practice and other bad faith claims. State of Connecticut v. … Continue Reading
The California Supreme Court recently issued a significant decision regarding the applicability of that state’s Unfair Competition Law (UCL) to the insurance industry, allowing certain types of such claims to be brought against insurers, potentially expanding insurers’ extra-contractual liability in that jurisdiction. On August 1, 2013, in Zhang v. The Superior Court Of San Bernardino … Continue Reading
In insurance fraud cases involving actual or alleged destruction of evidence by the insured, an issue often arises regarding whether an adverse inference instruction is appropriate, and, if so, what form it should take. The Second Circuit recently approved a “light” form of adverse inference instruction that allowed the jury to make an adverse inference … Continue Reading
Significant attention has been given in the media to the New York Assembly’s recent passage of several bills, apparently motivated by Storm Sandy, that would impact property insurance claim handling and litigation. None of these bills have been passed by the state senate yet, or signed by the governor. Some of them have been inaccurately described in … Continue Reading
In Florida, bad-faith actions against insurers pursuant to Section 624.155 cannot be brought until (1) the insured files a civil remedy notice (CRN) accepted by Florida’s Department of Financial Services; and (2) the underlying breach of contract lawsuit is “resolved in the insured’s favor.” See Blanchard v. State Farm Mut. Ins. Co., 575 So. 2d 1289, … Continue Reading
In 2008, the New York Court of Appeals decided the companion cases of Bi-Economy Market, Inc. v. Harleysville Ins. Co., 10 N.Y. 3d 187) (2008) and Panasia Estates, Inc. v. Hudson Insurance Co., 10 N.Y. 3d 200 (2008), which held that “consequential damages resulting from a breach of the covenant of good faith and … Continue Reading
In Katie Realty, Ltd. d/b/a The Landry Building v. Louisiana Citizens Property Ins. Inc., 2012 La. LEXIS 2710 (La. Oct. 16, 2012), the Louisiana Supreme Court reversed the First Circuit Court of Appeals and held that a written settlement agreement does not constitute a “proof of loss” under La. Rev. Stat. § 22:1892 (A)(1) and, … Continue Reading
A few weeks ago, we reported on the Florida appellate court’s decision in Trafalgar At Greenacres, LTD v. Zurich American Ins. Co., No. 4D11-1376 (Fla. 4th DCA, Sept. 5, 2012), in which the court permitted a policyholder to sue its property insurer for bad faith even though the trial court had ruled that the insurer … Continue Reading
In many jurisdictions, a bad faith case predicated on a property insurer’s denial or alleged underpayment of a claim will not reach a jury if it is determined that the insurer fulfilled its obligations under the contract. The rationale is that if the insurer’s alleged conduct does not rise to the level of a breach … Continue Reading
Some jurisdictions impose specific requirements on insurance companies regarding timely payment of undisputed amounts or amounts due after a settlement agreement is reached. Some jurisdictions impose penalties for failure to pay undisputed amounts or amounts due pursuant to a settlement agreement within a specified period of time. In Instant Replay Sports, Inc. v. Allstate Insur. … Continue Reading
As insurance companies begin the process of adjusting Hurricane Isaac insurance claims, we thought it would be helpful to highlight briefly on our blog some of the key case law from Hurricane Katrina, and some key Louisiana statutes regarding insurance claim adjustment: Water Damage Exclusions: The Louisiana Supreme Court ruled in Sher v. Lafayette Insurance … Continue Reading
When a loss arguably spans more than one policy period (the time period while a particular policy is in effect), the rule of law known as trigger of coverage, along with any policy provision addressing the issue, determines when a loss is considered to have occurred, and thus which policy or policies cover a particular … Continue Reading
Across the country we have seen attempts by insureds to bring a private right of action based on a breach of the implied warranty of good faith and fair dealing with regard to insurance policies. Most recently, this issue came before the Florida Supreme Court, which determined that no such private right of action exists … Continue Reading
The Fifth Circuit recently affirmed the Eastern District of Louisiana’s grant of summary judgment to the insurer where the insureds refused to submit to an Examination Under Oath (“EUO”) before filing a law suit against their insurer. In Hamilton v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Ins. Co., State Farm insured the Hamiltons under a homeowners’ policy … Continue Reading
While Hurricane Katrina related litigation is generally winding down, there are still some cases which are making their way through the Louisiana appellate process. In the most recent decision coming out of the Louisiana Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal, a causation dispute led to an award in favor of an insured for consequential damages and … Continue Reading
